

The Disappearance of Walter J. Manville, Ph.D
Illustrated by Maryn Carlson
In 2004, the NYT published Jacques
Derrida, Abstruse Theorist, Dies at 74
T
he purpose of the morning edition is to provide the fodder for evening small talk. This latest innovation in modern man’s arsenal of banality is intended to lift from Adam’s brow the heavy burden of contemplation in a universe whose most conspicuous characteristic is complexity and whose most discernible riddle is consciousness. It should therefore come as no surprise that news of the disappearance of the abstruse academic, Professor Walter J. Manville, covered in the graying columns of grim Thursday, was buried beneath the pages of Friday’s prostitution plot. It was completely forgotten by sunny, shimmering Saturday, high seventy-five. Now, a sparse year later, he has been tacitly announced dead by the Discourse Department that quietly scrubbed its office clean of his memory and delivered his delinquent property to the doorstep of yours truly, his only professional successor and, consequently, his only academic adversary.E
ven less is known of his university education. Manville appeared as if from nowhere into the upper echelons of academia as a doctoral candidate, descending on the small village of Princeton where he was a regular at 112 Mercer Street after meeting its famous resident in a local ice cream parlor. Einstein must have seen himself in the broodingly brilliant young buck, as interested as he was in discovering the Theory of Everything. Of course, the main difference between the two was that Einstein failed where Manville succeeded. Newton’s successor comically failed to explain everything in an edible equation, tragically falling victim to the obscurity he sought to apprehend.T
he validity of Manville’s doctrine has been called into question since its appearance and, more recently, since his personal disappearance and presumed death. In the words of critic Barbara McCarthy, “it is twice as illogical to believe that an immortal could die as it is to believe a human could become immortal via a poppycock philosophy.” Many share her low estimation of the man, finding him to be the very embodiment of a school of thought that undermines the pillars of classical education. Mr. Manville once commented on the phenomenon, saying, “A prophet is not without honor but in his own time, among his own kin, in his own house.”B
efore I conclude, I feel it pressing to respond to the libelous claims that I created Walter J. Manville many years ago, and have since been disseminating the negative conception of human divinity central to his, and thus my own, philosophy—if I am to be presumed his Creator. Were it true, I would be the author of the secondgreatest fiction ever devised, a title I would not easily deny if it had any validity. Even more absurd are the claims that the man is not dead but has instead withdrawn from the world. To these believers I say that there is no doubt in my mind that the rotting body of Walter J. Manville will soon be found by law enforcement, perhaps behind a boulder in some distant cave where he sought refuge as a hermit in the last days of his earthly life.